Re: The Burden of Proof

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Debate ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Mohamed Ghounem on February 20, 1998 at 19:38:58:

In Reply to: Re: The Burden of Proof posted by Mike on February 20, 1998 at 17:20:39:

Dear brother Mike,
Hi,
Thank you for your reply,

Mike: How could my statement be false when you concede that Christians accept Christianity so it is accepted.

Mohamed: Here you more clearly demonstrate your biost views. If I used the same logic (i.e. Muslims except Islam, therefore Islam is accepted) you would be a hypocrite and tell me I am not following logic.

There is nothing else to say to a bigot/hypocrite/fake like you. In closeing, "Jews accept the central message of Islam" : http://debate.org.uk/weboard/debate/messages/1082.html


(One Creator without Partners) "More" then the Jews accept the message of the church (Three gods in one), therefore according to your own logic, Islam is historically correct while Christianity is false.

The Proof is in the above site, if you don't accept it, that is your free choice, I only sypothize for you and your kind.

My humble apologies for being a bit offensive in previous posts, you are close minded and it is not your fault, you have been raised to only accept your own kind's view points and ignore others, some day you will realize that your church is not the center of the universe and maybe then you could pick up a good book by Darwin.

Mike: I did not say Christiantiy=logic

Mohamed: That's a start :-)


Peace and Blessings,
Your brother in Islam: Mohamed

Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 

Subject  : Re: Re: The Burden of Proof
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Debate ] [ FAQ ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved