Re: The Burden of Proof

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 

Subject  : Re: Re: The Burden of Proof

Comments:
: Dear brother Ryan, 

: Hi, I notice you don't say much :-)

: You wrote:
: : Dear Mohamed? (or Ghounem?),

: Mohamed is fine :-)

: : Can't help it but notice that you probably find it hard to
: : understand the thrust of Mike's argument but to make it a little
: : easier perhaps you would like to look at the following document
: : about logical fallacies etc.  (or Hey Mike, make it easier would
: : ya? :) )

: : <a href="http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html">Click here</a>

: : Sorry to point you to an atheist site which has material that
: : might undermine your beliefs.

: Thank you, No apologies needed, The Heavens and the Earth and All that is in Between is proof to Light up ones Faith who opens their eyes.

: I visited your site and it does explain alot, now a simple question and maybe you can shed respect back on the Christian faith by answering this question of Logic:

: If a person came along and said "God is one without partners"

: A second person came along and said that "God is Three in One"

: A third person came along and said "God is one without partners"

: Now according to Mike's logic, the new must prove itself to the old, the first to come with miracles and signs would determine if those that follow are True or not.

: 
: Now the first person says God is one without partners, the second says god is three in one, the Third says God is one without partners.

: According to history brother Ryan, who is giving the same message, the second or the third.

: The answer is clear, according to history, the original message is God is one without partners, therefore out of the Three people, the second one is giving a different message.

: I do appreciate your reply and will admit that I had no clue what Mike was talking about concerning that Micro and Macro Match Box cars he was talking about, maybe you can spell it out?

: Peace and Blessings,
: Your Brother in Islam: Mohamed