Though much of what you contend with about the Quran and Muhammad is grotesquely inaccurate and truly absurd I don't know where to begin with a rebuttal to your content posted on your website. So let me start with this, first of all before you go trying to attack the Quran you must first thoroughly examine the Old Testament and The New Testament (Bible). It is a proven fact among Christian and Jewish scholars that the Bible as a whole has been changed on numerous occasions, as well as books taken out purposely. Much of the Christians tenets of faith were designed and conceived at the Council of Nicea under the wicked leadership of the Roman Emperor Constantine, this link proves that point (http://www.submission.org/Jesus.html) or Paul who never new Jesus at all. You may try to refute this but this is well documented in the world of history and no Christian scholar can debate this fact. Much of what you believe to be from Jesus is not from Jesus at all; in fact Jesus never called himself a Christian that was a name given to you at The Battle of Antioch. Being that Constantine was pagan worshipper much of the Christians tenets of faith have pagan origins wrapped with Jesus' name on top of it. Constantine only wanted to rule a kingdom united under the Roman Empire by whatever means he needed to that, and he chose religion as that unifying factor. Secondly the Quran says of itself that it is not a new revelation but a compilation of the best work of the prophets that came before Muhammad Sura 16 verse 68-69 say that. Little does the European world or that of the Christian world no that the Quran is a mathematically precise written book, proven by Dr. Khalifah in the early 70's. To understand what I'm talking about go to this website (http://www.submission.org/miracle-history.html) and I challenge you to explore the whole site. If you go do this website, much if not all of your arguments are null and void I think the latter is the case. If you understand what the website is saying then you will know why the Quran says that you cannot produce anything like it and if you like you can try but you will not be successful in your efforts. So by you trying to pit Bible verses against that of the Quran is really in vain. You and all of your mathematical scholars couldn't produce 1 chapter let alone a book like that of the Quran and that why it may makes such claims of itself. It's just not a matter poetic serenity and how well it sounds, it is a matter of pure unadulterated fact built on scientific knowledge. Muhammad was an un-learned man in the way of standard education so he could not have in his wildest dreams as you claim and come up with the mathematical properties that back up the Quran. Then on top of all that you say that the Quran was not compiled together until some 100-200 or more years after is death. That is a complete farce, if you would have took the time to study the history of Islam and not quote Europeans in your work you would have known that every part of the Quran was committed to memory as well as written down on whatever writing material that they could find. When this was down the prophet looked over the work and told them where exactly to put this verse and that verse. Abu Bakr made a complete compilation of the Quran before Muhammad died and the Uthman made copies and distributed the copies across the new Islamic world, so your claims are completely off base entirely. Nowhere in your work did you quote the most authentic Hadiths, which are Sahih Bukhari. To quote fellow Europeans or white American's to back up your claims is ridiculous, that's like asking the fox did you kill any of my chickens in my chicken coop. Though I made that analogy many Western religious scholars have said that the Quran is an unchanged book since it's inception and scientist have made the same claimed discovering the scientific evidence in the Quran that Muhammad nor the Arabs could of known until are time and age, though you try to refute the embryology science on your website. And by the way the embryology science is not the only science that is in the Quran you need to do more investigation. There is so much to say but I'll end with what I have said, if you investigate like you should then you will have to say the Quran is from a higher source than that of Muhammad and that of your understanding of the Quran or Islam. Quit trying to find indifferences and try to find bridges that can end this centuries old debate Islam against Christianity or vice versa, isn't that how the Christian Crusades started over whose religion is better mine or yours sounds like a bunch of children playing with dynamite.
Thank you,
Rodney Woodall
